| QUOTE (Elroy @ June 26, 2009 01:14 am) | ||||
unless one fell in my lap, like if dingus decided to give me his, I wouldnt pay the money for one, I just dont think the the money paid is worth no better sound gain. now if I was rich, well thats another story, as a matter of fact i wouldnt even lower myself to this teeny web site, i'd be somewhere that my rich snobbish attitude would work, like AK elroy |

| QUOTE (Elroy @ June 25, 2009 05:14 pm) | ||||
unless one fell in my lap, like if dingus decided to give me his, I wouldnt pay the money for one, I just dont think the the money paid is worth no better sound gain. now if I was rich, well thats another story, as a matter of fact i wouldnt even lower myself to this teeny web site, i'd be somewhere that my rich snobbish attitude would work, like AK elroy |
| QUOTE (Mark B @ June 28, 2009 05:56 pm) |
| Lossless recordings on hard drives can be superlative. |
| QUOTE (Mark B @ June 27, 2009 03:52 pm) |
| Any Yamaha TOTL CD player gets you a great transport. Models like the CDX-1100 usually sell for under $200. |
| QUOTE (Elroy @ June 29, 2009 08:35 am) | ||
If you see one in that price range let me know, I would love to match up my system. elroy |
| QUOTE (Jim Eck @ June 30, 2009 10:12 am) |
| ...... Would the laser make a difference in how the disc was read? Or is going to come down to better quality disks in conjunction with a better laser before a difference can be appreciated? Jim |
| QUOTE (clint e. @ June 30, 2009 05:53 am) | ||
Possibly due to poor tracking or focussing, and reading, the recovered envelope may not be perfect, but although the ripped information may be correct, I believe other factors like jitter, and the player's tracking motor current draws due to working harder will likely degrade the overall "sonics". Only an educated guess though. BTW, i bought a better power supply fom Nox for my comp, later i'll put some pics. |



