I know I'm running the risk of starting yet another "which is better - vinyl or CD?" - argument, but my vote insofar as the context of this thread is an unequivocal endorsement of the CD.
I've stated before that I've always believed the CD has always had the
potential to outperform vinyl, though it doesn't always do that due primarily to cost restraints in the manufacture of the CD, and the overall ability or prowess of the recording engineer. I own numerous duplicate LP's and CD's, and for the most part, I find the sound better on the CD than the LP.
I think what's important here is that the turntable/cartridge combination, as well as the CD player, or CD transport/D/A converter combo be of
commensurate quality before one can make a fair assessment as to which is the superior medium. A TOTL Lynn-Sondek turntable, equipped with a Benz moving coil cartridge will almost surely outperform a $99.95 no-name CD player. On the other hand, a costly CD transport (The TEAC "Esoteric" type, for exmaple) combined with an equally costly D/A converter may give that Lynn-Sondek/Benz combo a run for its money.
My turntable is the excellent, though not unsurpassed, Dual CS-5000, equipped with the Stanton Collector's Series 100 cartrdige (Stanton's best ever cartridge) connected to a Parasound PH-100 phono preamp, as my Parasound PLD-1100 "Line Drive" preamp has no phono input. My CD comb is an Adcom GCD-600 changer, connected to an Adcom GDA-600 outboard D/A converter via a fairly costly (though nowhere near as costly as some) coax interconnect. The Adcom combo vastly outperforms my older Denon 1500II player in every way imaginable.
My turntable/cartridge combo
vis a vis the CD transport/D/A combo are, in my opinion, of commensurate quality on the overall sonic/price spectrum, so comparisons between the two are fair.
So, in that case, which sounds better? Almost always the CD, and even older CD's which, upon their initial release were criticiized for being overly bright and shrill. A perfect exmaple is Simon and Garfunkle's "Bridge Over Troubled Water." On older equipment, I always found the LP to be more pleasant to listen to, but now, there's no doubt the CD sounds better in every way.
And, of course, there are the well over 100 Telarc Classical CD's I own, which have no peer in vinyl - period. The overall richness, depth, and deep, throaty sound of brass and/or French horns has never been duplicated on LP, and of course, there's Telarc's famous use (perhaps
over-use) of bass drums that also has no vinyl peer.
In addition, just to get back on track here, the CD's are always silent with no pops, clicks or background "grunge" whatsoever, which even some of my most expensive, direct-to-disc LP's have. For some reason I can't explain, the surface noise of an LP seems less now when listening on the CS-5000, but after listening to vinyl for a while, the complete lack of any nosie whatsoever from a CD is a blessing.
My two cents, again.