| QUOTE (dingus @ October 24, 2009 01:20 pm) |
| nice find Sam, you might be surprised at how much you like how these sound. |
| QUOTE (thedelihaus @ October 25, 2009 07:48 am) |
| What year of date are these? Any chance if pics? |
| QUOTE (thedelihaus @ October 25, 2009 11:08 am) |
| Attractive looking setup. I've never spent any serious listening to Rotel kit, besides one piece, only passive listening sessions, and it sounded very good to my ears. I was unaware it sported a forward sound. The only Rotel I've really spent time with is the excellent 1072 CDP. Really like it. |
| QUOTE (socal sam @ October 25, 2009 03:06 pm) |
| ...his Ipod, which I think are amp and speaker killers... |
| QUOTE (thedelihaus @ October 26, 2009 11:50 am) | ||
Why do you think this? I think I have an idea but would love you to elaborate. I have some concern myself on this- but more concerned around the tweeters than woofers. Fill me in- I am interested. |
| QUOTE (thedelihaus @ October 26, 2009 02:43 pm) |
| Huh, actually I was off base here. I, on occasion, run the iPod via a plugged-in dock through the HT receiver for dozing-off music. This seems to keep the power supply flux a non-issue. Nonetheless, even with uncompressed files, or with a Red Wine modded iPod, indeed it's easier to achieve better sound quite easily and not at any significant cost, relatively speaking. My concern was the abnormalities that some files develop. A poor transfer, or an out-of-print record downloaded off a blogspot occasionally introduce some gawd-awful sounds into a system. I usually experience this in the upper frequencies only. Painful to hear, pants-crapping to what it makes the speakers sound like. Is it damaging? I dunno- but it sure doesn't sound nice. Often it is loud- seems to eek by any volume settings or limiting controls. Absolutely unpleasant and totally nervewrecking. Thanks for sharing your theory. Food for thought. |