I worked for dbx (or rather, BSR, who owned dbx at the time) when the Soundfield speakers in question were manufactured. None of the drivers in any dbx Soundfield speaker were particularly noteworthy, but all fell within the engineer's paramaters for the precise dispersion patterns to qualify for that special "Soundfield imaging" for which the speakers were known. There are far better replacement drivers that will improve the sound of the speakers, but none that will generated that special imaging quality.
This link, while certainly well intentioned, has only parts for the Soundfield V, which was manufactured exclusively for DAK industries, and has no bearing whatseover on any previous dbx speaker, nor deserves the "Soundfield" name, as its dispersion pattern was nothing like any of the previous speakers made by dbx (the "V" was made elsewhere).
DAK (Drew Alan Kaplan) was a huge BSR customer, who longed for dbx products, but due to his manner of selling, was considered anathema for the company and its retailers. Once the dbx brand (as well as the ADC brand) were sold to Carillon Technology Inc. (CTI), all bets were off, and the powers-that-be at CTI purposely put the dbx consumer lilne under, and readily (and greedily) offered a truly lousy product (the dbx "Soundfield V") to DAK.
The last link in the above-quoted post is probably the most useful, and definitely one worth looking into. dbx's Soundfield speaker line was never particularly successful, but at least they worked as promised: you had a perfect stereo image no matter where you sat - even directly in front of one of the two speakers. The so-called "Soundfield V" made for, and sold by DAK did nothing of the sort. Older dbx Soundfield speakers can be improved by replacing tweeters and midrange units with better ones, but the imaging qualities will be destroyed.