2L, a Norwegian record company puts out the first SACD/Blue-ray disc, using the high capacity of this format witch include five tracks in hi-res.
Also, it is possble to download this record in 24/96 or buy the organic disc though the internet.![wink.gif](http://soundt.18.<a href="http://www.forumer.com">forumer</a>.com/html/emoticons/wink.gif)
Seems like some record companies "have some fun" inventing taxes after taxes for this and for that...( btw, after six years, whatever happen to the 120 Million Dollars Napster had to pay to RIAA?![ph34r.gif](http://soundt.18.<a href="http://www.forumer.com">forumer</a>.com/html/emoticons/ph34r.gif)
) Meanwhile, others are making everything they can to bring us music with the best possible quality.
Two completly different ways of seeling music, if not antagonistics, but imo i sincerely hope the most intelligent and non-belivers in DRM protection prevails through others whose main concern is profit at all costs with the less possible quality.
Sometimes we have more "quality" in 320 kb/s MP3 - not to mention FLAC - from internet downloads than in some 1411 kb/s lousy cd's...). But, this is another issue...
Also, it is possble to download this record in 24/96 or buy the organic disc though the internet.
Seems like some record companies "have some fun" inventing taxes after taxes for this and for that...( btw, after six years, whatever happen to the 120 Million Dollars Napster had to pay to RIAA?
) Meanwhile, others are making everything they can to bring us music with the best possible quality.Two completly different ways of seeling music, if not antagonistics, but imo i sincerely hope the most intelligent and non-belivers in DRM protection prevails through others whose main concern is profit at all costs with the less possible quality.
Sometimes we have more "quality" in 320 kb/s MP3 - not to mention FLAC - from internet downloads than in some 1411 kb/s lousy cd's...). But, this is another issue...