Full Version : The Perfect Pitch vs. Human Imperfection
soundt >>General >>The Perfect Pitch vs. Human Imperfection


<< Prev | Next >>

dingus- 10-08-2008
someone told me that JLo and Shania Twain use a pitch device to stay on key ....

Superfly- 10-08-2008
I have seen this one used in studios, works very well but i feel it is cheating.

http://www.antarestech.com/

With drum machines and this crap and sampling, where is the real music. My kids are tired of me telling them that a dude rapping about whos pants he is getting into over a drum machine with a sampled bit of a classic song is not music. i hate that crap, unfortunately that's all my kids listen to. Well, my son does listen to some stuff that is real musicians and music but is still mostly crap.

Jim Eck- 10-08-2008
And I want to agree to disagree with you, I believe it was the begining, no longer was it what was able to be laid down on the track at the time of recording but what they were able to enhance. A technicality yes, but a begining to an end. You are correct it was still the original performers but not what could be reproduced without enhancement.

Jim

clint e.- 10-08-2008
QUOTE (Superfly @ October 08, 2008 01:16 am)
I have some hendrix stuff I'd like to fix. biggrin.gif That guy would play so drunk / stoned he did not care. Some of it is almost unlistenable.

Did you know that producer Alan Douglas got hold of some unfinished Hendrix multitrack tapes in the early '70's and proceeded to WIPE the original bass and drum tracks, replacing them with vastly different tracks cut long after Jimi's death by various LA slickateers?
The resulting albums, Midnight Lightning and Crash Landing, were so unbelievably horrid that some reviews at that time - i think it was Rolling Stone mag - deemed them " blasphemy unto the Lord".

Are these the albums you're talking about?





Jim Eck- 10-09-2008
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 08, 2008 03:30 pm)
I know what you mean, but i don't concur with you. sad.gif
Because the using and sometimes abusing of overdubbing is still the same technique using today in the digital age. Okey, nowadays there are harmonizers and a lot of other software similar to overdubbing...
I'm not against using the studio as an "instrument" or a tool to create depth, echo or reverb - i'm a fan of the "Wall of Sound" of Phil Spector - what i do not like at all is using digital artifacts to homogenize/robotize as an excuse for the perfect pitch and forgetting all the human imperfections, emotions and soul.

I think I know what you mean, used as an instrument, moog sythesizer and such could be ok, Pink Floyd, Kraftwerk, Emerson Lake and Palmer and Yes all excellent performers, but when the performers simply can't sing and or play any type of instrument and use technology to become a performer because they happen to fit the clothes some marketing person picked out it is unacceptable.

Originally overdubbing was to get harmony's and other sounds (more instruments) without bringing in other performers.

Jim

clint e.- 10-09-2008
QUOTE (Jim Eck @ October 09, 2008 12:01 pm)
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 08, 2008 03:30 pm)
I know what you mean, but i don't concur with you. sad.gif
Because the using and sometimes abusing of overdubbing is still the same technique using today in the digital age. Okey, nowadays there are harmonizers and a lot of other software similar to overdubbing...
I'm not against using the studio as an "instrument" or a tool to create depth, echo or reverb - i'm a fan of the "Wall of Sound" of Phil Spector - what i do not like at all is using digital artifacts to homogenize/robotize as an excuse for the perfect pitch and forgetting all the human imperfections, emotions and soul.

I think I know what you mean, used as an instrument, moog sythesizer and such could be ok, Pink Floyd, Kraftwerk, Emerson Lake and Palmer and Yes all excellent performers, but when the performers simply can't sing and or play any type of instrument and use technology to become a performer because they happen to fit the clothes some marketing person picked out it is unacceptable.

Originally overdubbing was to get harmony's and other sounds (more instruments) without bringing in other performers.

Jim

Even today's rock bands like The Smashing Pumpkins use to overdubbing - more than ten times - their guitar sound to have a distortion with more rich, fat and wider harmonics. wink.gif

Grant Fidelity- 10-09-2008
QUOTE (itlldue @ October 08, 2008 01:41 pm)
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 08, 2008 11:13 am)


Overdubbing as nothing to do with digital, not even with multitrack recording.


Technically, you're right, but back in the old days, overdubbing was used to the same end result as digital modification, in some cases. Back to the Beach Boys. Their harmony sucked because no two of them could carry the same tune twice in a bucket. That's why (supposedly) they were so bad live. They would "tweak" their vocal recordings separately, then combine them to make the final.

The Carpenters, on the other hand, sang well. The overdubbing, in their case, was just to give the appearance of a large group of singers.

Ever hear the 1980 'live at Knebworth' ?, all the boys where together for the last time and they nailed it !!!. It is still one of my favs and I'll be opening off the RMAF show tomorrow with it.

Digital studio toys are fun, lots of great writers or composers aren't so great at performing, lot's can't afford a great band in the studio and lot's of studio engineers are frustrated or untalented musicians smile.gif, me included and these toys become part of their artisitic impression.

All this still came available in the mid-80's and has used on a good high percentage of music making since. The studio and engineer has been a member of many great bands.

Multitracking is a great tool, for bands that write in the studio, it is amazing to see how a riff can become a great song that way and how a harmony doubled just makes the chorus jump out for example.

That said multi-tracking becomes like work and after a few years of it I would go on a 2 channel live off the floor recording to get my head clear.

If topics like this interest you, I really suggest grabbing some books about Les Paul's career, inventions and methods. I build my favourite studio based in Les's methods, no control room, that was fun and musical.

Ian

Elroy- 10-09-2008
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 08, 2008 11:13 am)

Btw,the first digitally recorded album of popular music was made by Rye Cooder in '79 even before the first digital compact discs marketed in 1982.  ohmy.gif

So we can blame all this on rye cooter, right. he started the revolution into digital, so down with ry.

elroy

clint e.- 10-10-2008
QUOTE (Elroy @ October 09, 2008 04:09 pm)
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 08, 2008 11:13 am)

Btw,the first digitally recorded album of popular music was made by Rye Cooder in '79 even before the first digital compact discs marketed in 1982.  ohmy.gif

So we can blame all this on rye cooter, right. he started the revolution into digital, so down with ry.

elroy

Don't blame on Rye, mate.
I'm not against digital, don't get me wrong. We can do amazing things with digital data.

Try listen to a cd mastered and printed in the '80's or early '90's and compared it to another one of 2000....
Something changed for worth much much worth and not because of the digital format...

As anyone tried it?

Elroy- 10-10-2008
QUOTE (clint e. @ October 10, 2008 11:28 am)

elroy [/QUOTE]
Don't blame on Rye, mate.
I'm not against digital, don't get me wrong. We can do amazing things with digital data.

Try listen to a cd mastered and printed in the '80's or early '90's and compared it to another one of 2000....
Something changed for worth much much worth and not because of the digital format...

As anyone tried it?

I know, I was just kidding, that was one of those language nuances, but you are true, I do enjoy a mastered disc from the 80's and 90's.

elroy

clint e.- 10-10-2008
QUOTE (Elroy @ October 10, 2008 08:15 pm)
[QUOTE=clint e.,October 10, 2008 11:28 am]
elroy [/QUOTE]
Don't blame on Rye, mate.
I'm not against digital, don't get me wrong. We can do amazing things with digital data.

Try listen to a cd mastered and printed in the '80's or early '90's and compared it to another one of 2000....
Something changed for worth much much worth and not because of the digital format...

As anyone tried it? [/QUOTE]
I know, I was just kidding, that was one of those language nuances, but you are true, I do enjoy a mastered disc from the 80's and 90's.

elroy

I know you were kidding smile.gif) , but yesterday i was at my sister's house at a birthday party and one of the conversations at the party was exactly the differences between 80's-90's cd's compared to nowadays masterings and we all found huge differences. Even the younger guys - kids of 20 to 25 - felt exactly the same, and i know it wasn't from the beer... biggrin.gif

Free Forum Hosting by Forumer.comTM!