| New Account Validation Help · Enter Chat Here |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
|
|
| Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 11, 2008 06:58 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Good morning,
For the last several years I've been a "committed" HT junkie. I'd like to get back into the 2-channel music scene and could use some advice while looking for an affordable used CD player. Existing components are Yamaha HTR unit using preouts to a Yamaha M-80 and both conditioned with Monster 3600II unit. Down the line are Boston Acoustics VR-3's. So far, I flip between a Toshiba HD-DVD, a Blu-Ray and a Yamaha DV-S5950 for sources. Since the HTR allows easy changing to Direct mode and for cost reasons it will stay. Likewise the amp and speaker combination (using Monster Z-series) need to remain for dollars and sense. That leaves me with experimenting on the player and with a limited budget. Ebay doesn't make me nervous and I've bought on Audiogon with much happiness. Is there any other info I can pass along that would serve up much valued advice on a used player. I do like 90's Yamaha and Denon gear but know little about the dangers of buying a tempermental CD player used. Any opinions would be valued and of course, if you see//here something that looks interesting I'd be grateful for a link. Many thanks, Dutch |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 11, 2008 07:07 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
The lack of a remote is a deal killer but for example...
http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?dgtlplay&1215400359 Is this perhaps a good example of sound to value? Dutch |
| clint e. |
Posted: May 11, 2008 08:02 am
|
![]() D161t@L 0N L1N3 / Analog at heart Group: Moderator Posts: 6082 Member No.: 40 Joined: July 13, 2006 |
Imo, If you are after a very good CD player for a reasonable price, that's the one.
The OSE version have some important upgrades compared to normal version. Audiophile capacitors, better case, Marantz' proprietary, all-discrete HDAM (Hyper Dynamic Active Module) for output stage, instead of the NJR2114D op amps used in the standart model. Also, HDAM modules are enclosed in copper shielding, which is intended to protect them from stray interference pickup and electromagnetic fields. These are imho very important upgrades in any good cdp. In resume you can't go wong with Marantz. This post has been edited by clint e. on May 11, 2008 01:24 pm -------------------- ![]() " Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be measured " Albert Einstein![]() |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 11, 2008 04:13 pm
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Thank you for the input...I've sent the seller an offer. After reading the ad again I realized it was the box not the remote that was missing.
Let's see where it goes... Dutch |
| hifi_nut |
Posted: May 11, 2008 04:40 pm
|
![]() Giving it another try Group: Charter Member Posts: 3382 Member No.: 6 Joined: June 30, 2006 |
Read the Ad again, and good luck, Dutch.
The owner´s manual is missing, not the box. In my experience it always ads to the resale value if you have the original packing. Jorge |
| emaidel |
Posted: May 11, 2008 06:38 pm
|
|
Resident Grouser ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Manufacturer Posts: 462 Member No.: 65 Joined: August 25, 2006 |
For years I used the Adcom GCD-600 CD changer connected to the Adcom GDA-600 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC). I replaced them recently with the Marantz SA-8001 SACD player which is a truly magnificent piece of gear.
Still, the Adcom combination was very, very good, and, from what I was told by the folks at Adcom at the time it was introduced, the newer GCD-700 changer is the equal of the two 600-series units. Still better (and, as I recall, a Stereophile Class-A Recommendation) is the GDA-700 DAC, but they're very hard to come by. I've seen GCD=700's on ebay for a song. To me, that's quite a bargain. -------------------- "Official" licensed, resident grouser. So there.
|
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 12, 2008 05:56 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Sweet advice and much appreciated. The seller accepted my offer and I'm "committed" (or should be) to the Marantz unit.
I guess what I'm confused by is the whole DAC thing vs. integrated vs. vodoo. I absolutely resist the notion of complicated gear (it took me years to buy into the seperates arguement) and it's likely that puts me at odds with the premise of this hobby in general. The best set-up I ever had was a Carver pre, pro and CD driving older Klipsch speakers (long since forgotten the call sign). Back in 96 there came a need to make the rent and regretfully sold them. If I could have had a remote it was nirvana Anyways, since investing in a decent Harmony remote the issue is closed. Provided anything came with an original remote the multi unit has me covered. Maybe it shouldn't be that important but I do appreciate point n' shoot. The seller is c/o of Audiogon so no doubts about what I'm receiving. How I'm going to slip it past my significant other is a different story. Most times we say that in jest...she's not the giggling kind |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 12, 2008 07:20 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Since the Marantz comes with multiple connection options is there an advantage to any? Typically if digital audio is available (not coaxial) then I default to that. Should I consider using the RCA with good quality cables?
Dutch |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 12, 2008 08:01 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Having fun with the camera. I've no idea why the resolution is not so hot as it looked good on the download
http://s245.photobucket.com/albums/gg57/Ma...t=1210604923502 Dutch This post has been edited by Mako20ft on May 12, 2008 08:10 am |
| akdrama |
Posted: May 12, 2008 09:37 am
|
![]() Sound Thinking Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 48 Member No.: 404 Joined: February 07, 2008 |
Hey I know that subwoofer,
Nice subwoofer Dutch. I have one myself. Great sweet little beast it is. Barely run it over 4 for a 200 sq. ft. room. AK |
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 12, 2008 11:43 am
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
Nice thump without the boom...BA is so underrated in many circles. I team it with a Yamaha SW315 which is extrememly tight musically. Had both running for several years and could not be more pleased.
Dutch |
| dingus |
Posted: May 12, 2008 01:06 pm
|
||
![]() How can people be so cruel? Group: Admin Posts: 4731 Member No.: 3 Joined: June 29, 2006 |
unless you plug the cdp into a DAC, the analog RCA connections will be your only option. of course, always use quality cables. -------------------- Teledyne AR9, Yamaha B-2x, Yamaha M-2, Hafler DH-110, EAD DSP 1000, Wadia WT-3200.
|
||
| Mako20ft |
Posted: May 12, 2008 03:14 pm
|
|
Sound Thinking Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Member No.: 343 Joined: December 30, 2007 |
If I'm going optical out to the Yamaha HTR does this digital path degrade the sound? This is were I cry uncle...RCA or optical for standard CD's?
Dutch |
| Elroy |
Posted: May 12, 2008 03:20 pm
|
![]() Thread Killer Group: Moderator Posts: 3042 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 29, 2006 |
I think you would get a cleaner signal with an optical cable, but if I am wrong, I hope someone corrects me, my system sounds better using an optical cable.
elroy -------------------- I got nothing
Yamaha CX-2000 Yamaha MX-2000 Zhaolu 3.0 DAC Modded Vandersteen 2c Denon DP62L Marantz 67 SE CD Player Teac W990rx |
| clint e. |
Posted: May 12, 2008 04:24 pm
|
||
![]() D161t@L 0N L1N3 / Analog at heart Group: Moderator Posts: 6082 Member No.: 40 Joined: July 13, 2006 |
Imho you must choose a very good dac to beat the internal dacs the 6000 OSE has... The serie 6000 from Marantz cdps use two SM5872BS DACs in a differential configuration. Dual differential DAC implementation offer quite a big improvement over a single-ended configuration, especially if the entire design path is complimentary, which is the case here. The models 6000 maintain Marantz's tradition of having separate active low pass filter (LPF) stages from dedicated output stages. Model 6000 uses the well known and traditional to Marantz op amp, NJM2114D, for the LPF filter stage and Marantz’s proprietary HDAM discrete modules for the output stage, while model 6000 OSE eschews the NJM op amp for another pair of HDAM modules, uses better quality caps and better transformer. One more thing. If you choose the dac path and goes optical, imo you should try to find a away of experiment the many optical cables possible. They all sound different... Btw, we at ST have something about dac's and digital stuff here : http://soundt.18.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=787&st=15 Enjoy your new toy. This post has been edited by clint e. on May 12, 2008 04:31 pm -------------------- ![]() " Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be measured " Albert Einstein![]() |
||
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |