Powered by Invision Power Board


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> JBL L-300 Audition
socal sam
Posted: January 14, 2009 11:08 pm
Quote Post


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 986
Member No.: 265
Joined: July 25, 2007



The L-300 was playing through a pair of Mcintosh MC30 monoblocks, MAC SS preamp, Wadia transport, and Cal Audio tubed DAC. Listening level was around 90 dB. Music was Krall, Barber, and Lynn. Female jazz/blues.

I liked what I heard but I really couldn't tell if the tubes were making the speaker. (I bet HPM-100's would sound almost appealing with tubes.) However, the L-300 didn't spoil the tubes so that's good. Full bodied midrange makes vocals rich and fulfilling. Upper registers have very good transients but without the ultimate extension of SS, which can be good because shrill is not possible. The bass was the biggest disappointment. Granted, this set had two holes in the foam but what was there did not impress. The mids surround so much, the bass gets layered below. It is there but not satisfying.

Overall, the sound was very appealing and points me in a new direction for a second main system. I think tubes can deliver better sound with something other than the L-300. However, I did like the sound package and found them to be an easy appealing listen.
PMEmail Poster
Top
dingus
Posted: January 14, 2009 11:56 pm
Quote Post


How can people be so cruel?
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4734
Member No.: 3
Joined: June 29, 2006



one of the very best sounding systems i've heard was an entire McIntosh front end (sorry dont know what models the amps, pre and player were) driving a pair of JBL L-300's. i thought the sound throughout the entire spectrum was simply outstanding. this is one of only two systems i've heard where i could not detect compromises.



--------------------
Teledyne AR9, Yamaha B-2x, Yamaha M-2, Hafler DH-110, EAD DSP 1000, Wadia WT-3200.
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
socal sam
Posted: January 15, 2009 12:44 am
Quote Post


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 986
Member No.: 265
Joined: July 25, 2007



When I got home, the first thing I did was play the same tracks on my Yamaha system. I tried to match the SPL, which was medium-soft. First off, my SS system has so much more detail that I had to listen several times to be sure. Definition is definitely better but the extra resolution delivers artifacts that are sometime startling. I'm talking about vocalists inhaling and clucking, guitarists with poor fret fingering causing squeak, the list goes on. Somehow, the tube system put them in the background. OTOH, tubed vocals and natural instruments like piano, horns, and cymbols sound wonderful. I think the smoothness of the tubes pays dividends here.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll