Powered by Invision Power Board


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> NIKON D-5000 Digital SLR Camera, My Dream Camera!!
MacGyver
Posted: July 02, 2009 06:09 am
Quote Post


ST's Unofficial, Self-Professed "Mr.PIONEER"
****

Group: Members
Posts: 490
Member No.: 607
Joined: December 06, 2008



user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image




(TEST PHOTO)


user posted image




so, anyway, i absolutely adore this awesome Digital SLR!! i was just at the TRI-CITIES, WASH. COSTCO just yesterday, and saw that they have an exclusive D-5000 set that includes the camera body, two lenses, a carrying case and a set of instructional DVDs, for $1099. i'm working on a way to afford it by november. you guys will be the first to know about it, via some pics of my system, when i finally get it. wow, what an INCREDIBLE unit. the look and feel of classic Japanese SLR quality. hell, as you can see, Danny, the owner and admin of his Anime and life in Japan site, WWW.DANNYCHOO.COM just got himself one. everything he's shown of it tells me that it's a DAMN GOOD Digital SLR, and that it will not disappoint...

This post has been edited by MacGyver on July 02, 2009 06:23 am


--------------------
user posted image

PIONEER VSX-D1S TOTL 130w/ch. A/V Stereo Receiver (1990)
PIONEER PD-3000 Reference Compact Disc Player (1987) (JPN market version of U.S. market PD-91)
PIONEER PD-M90X Reference Multi-Play CD Player (1987) (the very first REFERENCE/ELITE multi-play CDP)
PIONEER CT-S800 (1988) full-featured TOTL Single-Well LaserAmorphous-Head cassette deck, with casted-iron transformer
PIONEER DV-09 Reference DVD Player (1997)
PIONEER CLD-3030 TOTL Compatible Laser Disc Player (1988)
PIONEER GR-777 Ten Band Stereo Graphic Equalizer (1988) (TOTL remote controllable EQ with dual spectrum display)
PIONEER CS-G503 Four-Way Stereo Loudspeaker System (199?)
PIONEER SE-305 Stereo Headphones (1974)
PIONEER MR-100 Multi-Room IR Receiver (1989)
PIONEER CU-MR100 Remote Control Unit (1989)
PIONEER CU-AV70 Programmable Remote Control Unit (1988)
PIONEER CU-AV100 Programmable Remote Control Unit (1988)
PIONEER CU-AV200 Programmable Remote Control Unit (1989)

-MISC.-

ELAC MIRACORD 46 Direct Drive Phonograph Turntable (197?)
DENON DCD-1500 CD player (1986) (heavily upgraded, Dual-Mono output TOTL)
PIONEER PD-M6 Multi-CD player (1986) (the very first PIONEER magazine CD changer)
JVC HR-S8000U S-VHS VCR (1988)
MITSUBISHI HS-U70 S-VHS VCR (1988)
ROLAND BOSS BR-1180 Hard Disk Digital Audio Recorder (2002)
JVC RM-S1 Universal Programmable Touch-Panel Remote Control (1988)

user posted image

♥Aoi Nishimata Fan♥
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
hakka26
Posted: July 02, 2009 09:57 am
Quote Post


Millenium Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 1231
Member No.: 57
Joined: August 02, 2006



Frankly, the cameras have gone the way of audio, IMHO. That was about the cost, if not less, of a comparable F2A setup back in the day. Nothing inherently wrong with digital but as with audio, just not the same.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Elroy
Posted: July 02, 2009 11:51 am
Quote Post


Thread Killer
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3045
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 29, 2006



digital is just so convenient, thats why I use it.


--------------------
I got nothing

Yamaha CX-2000
Yamaha MX-2000
Zhaolu 3.0 DAC Modded
Vandersteen 2c
Denon DP62L
Marantz 67 SE CD Player
Teac W990rx
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
hakka26
Posted: July 02, 2009 10:00 pm
Quote Post


Millenium Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 1231
Member No.: 57
Joined: August 02, 2006



QUOTE (Elroy @ July 02, 2009 10:51 am)
digital is just so convenient, thats why I use it.

I have a belief that that is most people's reason. I shot the Canon A-1 at my nephews graduation a couple weeks ago but I used a digital for the family pics. My take on the digital is that with a 2gig card anyone can call themselves a "pro" along the lines of "even a blind pig will eventually find a truffle". Had a rift on another site that started when I said all the talk about digital cameras failed to take into account the printer. Don't know where a self described "pro" was coming from but the next thing I know he was telling me to "shut up and listen." When I did he said nothing so I did. Left when the mod called out my name.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Elroy
Posted: July 03, 2009 06:30 am
Quote Post


Thread Killer
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3045
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 29, 2006



I bought a little 7 megapixel canon for 130 two years ago, and it takes pretty nice shots, I just put it on auto and fire away, I used to have a nice camera, and there was a bunch of manual selections, which I had now Idea how to use, and I assume the real nice digital cameras have the same manual options, and I bet if you knew how to use them you could probably get some real nice photos out of the deal.

elroy

btw I think nikon is is way overrated, kinda like infinity and bose are, but I have nothing to back that up with.



--------------------
I got nothing

Yamaha CX-2000
Yamaha MX-2000
Zhaolu 3.0 DAC Modded
Vandersteen 2c
Denon DP62L
Marantz 67 SE CD Player
Teac W990rx
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
hakka26
Posted: July 03, 2009 09:51 pm
Quote Post


Millenium Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 1231
Member No.: 57
Joined: August 02, 2006



That's the beauty of digital, firing away. Not saying anything is wrong with that. Yes, it does help to know the all technical aspects. What I didn't stay around to reply to is that you can immediately see what you shoot and correct if needed. WTF! What kind of pro is that? The only place that is valid is a studio product shoot and maybe inside shots of a wedding, though I wold be embarrassed if I kept telling the party to "hold it" while I checked the screen.

Cameras are more like fly fishing, better have a damn good pole but the reel could be a tuna can. Nikon was known for their lenses and the F bodies were built to match. Competition for Leica.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Elroy
Posted: July 04, 2009 10:02 am
Quote Post


Thread Killer
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3045
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 29, 2006



I think the high end real expensive are that, high end, and most times you get what you paid for.


--------------------
I got nothing

Yamaha CX-2000
Yamaha MX-2000
Zhaolu 3.0 DAC Modded
Vandersteen 2c
Denon DP62L
Marantz 67 SE CD Player
Teac W990rx
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
clint e.
Posted: July 04, 2009 10:55 am
Quote Post


D161t@L 0N L1N3 / Analog at heart
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6089
Member No.: 40
Joined: July 13, 2006



I still have a "Everything Manual" Zenit EM Russian camera. I loved the EM in spite of all it's quirks. Perhaps this was because my first real camera; it looked, felt and smelt like a real camera. rolleyes.gif
Contrary to digital, you had to be deliberate and patient to take a picture. Despite, or perhaps because of, the Zenit's crude mechanical nature and tractor-like engineering biggrin.gif it made a great learning tool. I learnt a little about photography because I had to if I wanted to get a good shot, and the embarrassment of not getting a good shot after lugging this monster around was not an option.
Digital cameras, even, and sometimes especially, the modest models, are technological marvels that want to do everything for you and often take a lot of persuasion to be convinced to let the picture taker set anything manually.
Focus, aperture, shutter speed - why learn any of it when a computer inside your camera knows it all already? unsure.gif

A few Zenit links:
http://anusf.anu.edu.au/~aab900/photograph...meras/zenit.htm

http://www.commiecameras.com/sov/35mmsingl...zenit/index.htm

http://cameras.alfredklomp.com/fs12/

Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)
Attached Image


--------------------
user posted image
user posted image " Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be measured " Albert Einsteinuser posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll